Here are a few of the most important conservation stories from 2014:
--Gila River Proposed Diversion approved by ISC
--Mexican Gray Wolf critical habitat expanded to include most of NM and AZ south of I-40
Zone 1 is where Mexican wolves may be initially released or translocated. Zone 2 is where Mexican wolves will be allowed to naturally disperse into and occupy, and where Mexican wolves may be translocated. Zone 3 is where neither initial releases nor translocations will occur, but Mexican wolves will be allowed to disperse into and occupy....where Mexican wolves will be more actively managed...to reduce conflict with the potentially affected public. However, in AZ east of Highway 87 there will be a "phased approach" to managing wolf populations.
--U.S. Congress Omnibus spending bill approves the Resolution mine landswap in AZ, grazing lease terms expanded to 20 years, and Valles Caldera becomes newest National Park
--Drought in CA (7% snowpack) ... and NM. (e.g. Heron Lake resevoir levels fall, fail to make San Juan-Chame deliveries to Rio Grande)
-- US EPA and NRCS try to regulate agriculture under CWA....and fail. The problem of increasing toxic algae problem in Ohio lakes came to a head in 2014 when Cleveland had to turn off their city water intake from Lake Eerie due to a toxic algal bloom. The proposed rule would have allowed EPA to regulate "non-point source" water pollution from farms that did not have a NRCS-approved conservation practices in place. But apparently the outcry was too much, and early in 2015 the rule was amended. Note that the final rule, even though it no longer contained this provision, was still vehemently protested in 2015.
-- Gunnison Sage Grouse listed as "Threatened" under the ESA, Colorado appeals.
-- Colorado River Pulse....mostly just grows more tamarisk.
-- Pleistocene megafauna extinction due to meteor impact, new study finds.
-- Wilderness turns 50 years old
-- New "stacked trait" GMO potatoes and soybeans approved in the U.S.
And a random tidbit: rabbits eat more forage in utah than bison...leading ranchers to question the state's continued bounty for coyote skins.
Showing posts with label wolf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wolf. Show all posts
Monday, January 19, 2015
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
New Science of Predator Control: Unexpected (emergent) Outcomes
Predator control has been based on the simplistic thinking that fewer lions or wolves would mean more deer and elk. Therefore, many states promote over-hunting predators. Interestingly, recent research from Washington State University's Dr. Wielgus and coworkers has reversed conventional wisdom: "Heavy hunting can result in higher overall density of cougars, increased predation on game, and more frequent conflicts with people -- in short, the exact opposite of what was intended." (quoted in National Geographic, Dec. 2013 "Cougars Make a Comeback")
Friday, February 29, 2008
Save Wolves from Federal Incompetence
Letter to the Editor:
The recent admission by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that only 29 gray wolves survive in Arizona (plus 23 in New Mexico) comes at the end of a multi-million dollar 10-year recovery effort. As a highly endangered species, our wolves, like all threatened animals in this great country, were afforded protection under the Endangered Species Act. But, instead of protecting the wolves as is their mandate, Fish and Wildlife continues to trap and kill the last remaining wolves in the Southwest.
Rather than listing the wolf population as endangered, Fish and Wildlife has, through a bureaucratic loophole, listed our wolves as an "experimental population" in the wild. This wordplay allows the government to exterminate wolves that venture outside of arbitrary wilderness release areas, as long as "backup" wolves are bred in captivity. Instead of letting mother nature restore the wolf for free, we pay millions of dollars to breed, release, and then kill wolves in an absurd parody of nature.
A more cynical citizen might presume political malfeasance in creating a "recovery plan" that was designed to fail. But I prefer to give the benefit of the doubt to our hardworking elected officials and presume that this situation is simply the result of one hand not knowing what the other is doing. The sheer incompetence, not to mention futile waste of taxpayer dollars, of this "experiment" is outrageous...with such low population levels the Southwest's gray wolf is poised to slip through a bureaucratic loophole into oblivion. If we wish to allow the wolf to survive we cannot allow the continued incompetence of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The recent admission by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that only 29 gray wolves survive in Arizona (plus 23 in New Mexico) comes at the end of a multi-million dollar 10-year recovery effort. As a highly endangered species, our wolves, like all threatened animals in this great country, were afforded protection under the Endangered Species Act. But, instead of protecting the wolves as is their mandate, Fish and Wildlife continues to trap and kill the last remaining wolves in the Southwest.
Rather than listing the wolf population as endangered, Fish and Wildlife has, through a bureaucratic loophole, listed our wolves as an "experimental population" in the wild. This wordplay allows the government to exterminate wolves that venture outside of arbitrary wilderness release areas, as long as "backup" wolves are bred in captivity. Instead of letting mother nature restore the wolf for free, we pay millions of dollars to breed, release, and then kill wolves in an absurd parody of nature.
A more cynical citizen might presume political malfeasance in creating a "recovery plan" that was designed to fail. But I prefer to give the benefit of the doubt to our hardworking elected officials and presume that this situation is simply the result of one hand not knowing what the other is doing. The sheer incompetence, not to mention futile waste of taxpayer dollars, of this "experiment" is outrageous...with such low population levels the Southwest's gray wolf is poised to slip through a bureaucratic loophole into oblivion. If we wish to allow the wolf to survive we cannot allow the continued incompetence of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
