Showing posts with label mexico. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mexico. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Wildlife Trends in Arizona: 150 Years of Winner and Losers

 Arizona’s wildlife history is an example of a timeline that occurred in many developing landscapes: an era of exploitation and eradication (1800s–1950s) followed by an era of restoration and management (1980s–present). 

However, there are some factors that were unique to the United States that led to distinct trends in wildlife populations when compared to those same species across the border in Mexico.

The following summary of research (Part 1) lists 16 Arizona species that were extirpated or greatly reduced and whether they have recovered.  Part 2 looks at 10 species that occur in both Arizona and Mexico and why their populations followed different trends.

This research illuminates the current state of wildlife and ecosystems in Arizona and helps explain the factors that got us here.

Part 1: Arizona vs. Wildlife

The following summary organizes species into groups based on their population trajectories: the “Great Returns” that were extirpated but have been successfully reintroduced, the “Survivors” that have been greatly reduced but still persist, and the “Lost Causes” that were extirpated but have not been successfully reintroduced. 

I. The "Great Returns": Extirpated & Successfully Reintroduced

These species were completely removed from the state but have been restored, often using proxy subspecies or captive breeding.

Rocky Mtn Elk

Extirpation Date/Cause: 1900: The native Merriam’s subspecies was hunted to extinction for meat and teeth.

Reintroduction Date/Area: 1913–1928: Rocky Mtn elk from Yellowstone were released near Winslow, Alpine, & Kingman.

Key Trend/Notes: Ecological Substitution: A proxy subspecies filled the empty niche, expanding rapidly due to lack of competition.

Mexican Gray Wolf

Extirpation Date/Cause: 1970: Eradicated by federal predator control programs (poison/traps) to protect livestock.

Reintroduction Date/Area: 1998: Captive-bred wolves released in the Blue Range Primitive Area.

Key Trend/Notes: Predator Tolerance: Success is biologically high but socially controversial; relies on ongoing conflict management.

 

California Condor

Extirpation Date/Cause: 1924: Vanished due to lead poisoning (bullets in carrion) and shooting.

Reintroduction Date/Area: 1996: Released at Vermilion Cliffs.

Key Trend/Notes: Intensive Care: Survival relies on active management (chelation therapy for lead) rather than self-sufficiency.

River Otter

Extirpation Date/Cause: 1950s: The native Sonora subspecies was  trapped out for fur.

Reintroduction Date/Area: 1981–1983:  Louisiana subspecies released in the Verde River.

Key Trend/Notes: Another Proxy: Like the elk, a non-native subspecies was used to successfully fill the vacant ecological role.

Black-footed Ferret

Extirpation Date/Cause: 1960s: Poisoning of their food source (prairie dogs) led to total extirpation.

Reintroduction Date/Area: 1996: Reintroduced in Aubrey Valley (Seligman).

Key Trend/Notes: Disease Barrier: Success is limited by sylvatic plague; requires dusting burrows and vaccines to persist.

Apache Trout

Extirpation Date/Cause: Mid-1900s: Hybridization with non-native rainbow trout and habitat loss.

Reintroduction Date/Area: 1955–Present: White Mtns (managed by White Mountain Apache Tribe & AZGFD).

Key Trend/Notes: The First Win: Became the first sportfish in history to be delisted from the Endangered Species Act (2024).

 

II. The "Survivors": Reduced but Persisted

These species were decimated by unregulated market hunting or predator control but survived in rugged refugia (escape terrain).

Desert Bighorn

Historic Low Point: Early 1900s: Reduced by diseases from domestic sheep and market hunting.

Survival Factor: Terrain: Survived in the most inaccessible desert peaks (Grand Canyon, Kofa).

Current Status: Translocated: Populations are moved to historic ranges (e.g., Santa Catalinas, Virgin River) to ensure genetic diversity.

 

Mountain Lion

Historic Low Point: 1960s: Bountied as "vermin" until 1970.

Survival Factor: Elusiveness: Solitary nature and rough terrain made total eradication impossible.

Current Status: Stable: Managed as a big game species; populations are robust statewide.

Beaver

Historic Low Point: 1890s: Trapped out of major rivers (San Pedro, Santa Cruz).

Survival Factor: Cryptic Behavior: Survived in deep canyons (Verde/Black River) by using bank burrows instead of lodges.

Current Status: Recovering: Reintroduced to the San Pedro (1999); used today for watershed restoration.

Pronghorn

Historic Low Point: 1920s: Fences cut off migration; market hunting reduced herds.

Survival Factor: Open Space: Remnant herds survived in vast private ranchlands (Babbitt Ranches).

Current Status: Managed: Sensitive to habitat fragmentation; relies on modifying fences for movement.

Gunnison’s Prairie Dog

Historic Low Point: 1930s: Poisoned across vast areas.

Survival Factor: Remote Refugia: Survived in the high-elevation Aubrey Valley; resistant to plague.

Current Status: Keystone: Their persistence allowed the Black-footed Ferret reintroduction to happen.

 

III. The "Lost Causes": Extirpated & Failed (or Struggling) Reintroductions

Complex social behaviors or specific habitat needs made simple reintroduction impossible.

Thick-billed Parrot

Extirpation Cause: 1938: Shooting/Poaching.

Reintroduction Outcome: Failed (1986–93): Chiricahua Mtns.

Why It Failed: Cultural Knowledge: Captive birds lacked flock wisdom to avoid hawks and find food.

Masked Bobwhite Quail

Extirpation Cause: 1900: Cattle overgrazing destroyed tallgrass cover.

Reintroduction Outcome: Struggling (1937–Present): Buenos Aires NWR.

Why It Failed: Habitat Specificity: Reintroduced birds often die due to lack of specific cover and predation; almost entirely reliant on captive releases.

Gila Topminnow

Extirpation Cause: 1940s: Invasive Mosquitofish.

Reintroduction Outcome: Mixed/Struggling: Multiple failures in the 80s/90s.

Why It Failed: Invasive Barrier: Cannot survive where aggressive non-native fish are present.

Jaguar

Extirpation Cause: 1963: Killed as predator.

Reintroduction Outcome: Natural Transients Only: No formal reintroduction.

Why It Failed: Political/Social: Only solitary males currently cross from Mexico; no breeding population exists.

Grizzly Bear

Extirpation Cause: 1936: Killed as predator.

Reintroduction Outcome: Permanently Extirpated.

Why It Failed: Social Tolerance: Requires vast, roadless wilderness that no longer exists in AZ; no plans to reintroduce.

 

Unifying Trends in Arizona Wildlife History:

The Predator Paradox:

Predators (wolves, grizzly bears and black bears, jaguars, lions) were targeted by federal policy for eradication to protect livestock.  Only the cryptic/solitary ones (lions, bears in rough terrain) survived. Reintroducing social predators (wolves) has been biologically successful but socially difficult.

The Proxy Solution:

When a native subspecies was completely lost (Merriam's Elk, Sonora Otter), biologists successfully substituted a close relative (Rocky Mtn Elk, Louisiana Otter).  These ecological substitutes often thrived because the niche was wide open and they were generalists.

The Behavioral Barrier:

Reintroductions of intelligent, social animals (Thick-billed Parrot) or habitat specialists (Masked Bobwhite) often fail.  Hard releases (letting animals go) work for generalists like elk but fail for species that require learned behavior or specific micro-habitats.

Part 2: Arizona vs. Mexico

This analysis breaks down Arizona’s extirpated and reduced species by comparing them to their source populations in other U.S. states and their often-distinct fates across the border in Mexico.

The overarching trend reveals a paradox: while the U.S. effectively managed game species (elk, sheep) through public land regulation, Mexico’s private land system (ranchos) inadvertently served as the final lifeboat for nongame species (wolves, prairie dogs, parrots) that were systematically eradicated in the U.S.

Successful Reintroductions: The Game Bias

The species that succeeded in Arizona were often abundant elsewhere in the U.S. but had been wiped out or severely reduced in Mexico.

Rocky Mtn. Elk

Status in Other U.S. States: Thriving: Millions exist across the Rockies (CO, MT, ID).

Status in Mexico: Extirpated / Rare: Native Merriam’s were also lost in Mexico. Small, private herds of Rocky Mtn. elk exist now on high-fence ranches in Coahuila/Sonora.

Accounting for the Difference: Public Land Management: The U.S. model of public land hunting funded the massive translocation efforts. Mexico lacked the public land base or agency funding to replicate this scale of reintroduction.

River Otter

Status in Other U.S. States: Secure: Abundant in the Mississippi Delta and Pacific Northwest.

Status in Mexico: Critical / Extirpated: The native Sonora otter is likely extinct in the Colorado River Delta due to the complete drying of the river before it reaches the sea.

Accounting for the Difference: Water Policy: Arizona’s otters survive in protected flows (Verde/Salt). In Mexico, the water is siphoned off for agriculture before it can support otter habitat.

Mexican Gray Wolf

Status in Other U.S. States: Extirpated: Historically ranged into NM/TX (now reintroduced there).

Status in Mexico: Reintroduced (Struggling): Mexico began releasing wolves in the Sierra Madre in 2011. The population is smaller and more fragile than the AZ/NM population.

Accounting for the Difference: Prey Base: In Arizona, wolves rely on abundant elk. In Mexico, elk are absent and deer are scarcer, forcing wolves to target livestock, leading to immediate conflict with ranchers.

Reduced/Survivors: The Refugia Divide

Species that held on in Arizona often did so in rugged terrain, while in Mexico, their fate depended heavily on the stewardship of individual landowners.

Desert Bighorn

Status in Other U.S. States: Stable: NV, CA, and UT have strong, managed herds.

Status in Mexico: Stable / Commercialized: In Sonora and Baja, bighorn are a high-value commodity. Private ranchers protect them aggressively to sell high dollar hunting tags ($50k+).

Accounting for the Difference: Economic Incentive: In the U.S., bighorn are protected by state agencies as a public trust. In Mexico, they survived because they became a private asset worth protecting from poachers.

Pronghorn

Status in Other U.S. States: Secure: WY and MT have massive herds.

Status in Mexico: Endangered (Sonoran Subspecies): The Sonoran Pronghorn (El Pinacate) is critically endangered.

Accounting for the Difference: Barriers: The U.S. herds had open range. The Mexican herds were hemmed in by highways (Hwy 2) and border fencing, severing their ability to find water during droughts.

Beaver

Status in Other U.S. States: Abundant:  r egained range across the West.

Status in Mexico: Recovering (Delta): The Colorado River Delta saw a miraculous, short-term return of beavers following the "Pulse Flow" (Minute 319) water release in 2014.

Accounting for the Difference: Resilience: Beavers in Mexico proved they are waiting in the wings; they only lack the water, whereas U.S. populations had consistent flows in mountain refugia.

Failed/Struggling: The Mexican Lifeboat

Species that failed in Arizona (often due to poisoning or habitat loss) survived in Mexico, which served as the last stronghold.

Masked Bobwhite

Status in Other U.S. States: Extirpated: Only exists in captivity/refuge.

Status in Mexico: Critical / Persistent: Small wild populations were rediscovered on private ranches in Sonora (e.g., Rancho Carrizo) in the late 20th century.

Accounting for the Difference: Grazing Intensity: While U.S. ranchers switched to exotic grasses (Lovegrass), some remote Sonoran ranches maintained native vegetation due to isolation and traditional (lower intensity) grazing practices.

Thick-billed Parrot

Status in Other U.S. States: Extirpated: No wild flocks in the U.S.

Status in Mexico: Endangered / Extant: ~2,000 birds breed in the Sierra Madre Occidental (Chihuahua/Durango).

Accounting for the Difference: Old Growth Timber: Arizona logged its sky island nesting snags by the 1930s. The remote Sierra Madre retained old-growth forests longer (though these are now threatened by logging).

Jaguar

Status in Other U.S. States: Extirpated: (Breeding populations).

Status in Mexico: Vulnerable / Breeding: A reproducing population exists in Sonora (Northern Jaguar Reserve), only ~120 miles south of the border.

Accounting for the Difference: Road Density: Arizona is crisscrossed by paved roads and development. The Sonoran habitat is more rugged, roadless, and largely privately owned, reducing human-cat interaction.

Black-tailed Prairie Dog

Status in Other U.S. States: Extirpated: Widespread poisoning campaigns.

Status in Mexico: Thriving (Janos): The Janos Biosphere Reserve in Chihuahua holds one of the largest prairie dog complexes in North America.

Accounting for the Difference: Benign Neglect: The U.S. government funded industrial-scale poisoning. The Mexican government lacked the funds for such programs, inadvertently allowing the massive colonies to survive until conservationists bought the land.

Summary of Differences

The Industrial Efficiency of Extirpation

Arizona’s extirpations were often more thorough than Mexico’s because the U.S. had the resources to be efficient. Government-sponsored predator control (wolves/jaguars) and poisoning (prairie dogs) were well-funded industrial operations in Arizona. Mexico, lacking these centralized resources, allowed "pest" species to survive simply through "benign neglect."

Public vs. Private Conservation

Arizona: Success relies on public land management (US Forest Service/BLM). This is great for generalists like elk but hard for specialists that need specific micro-habitats.

Mexico: Survival has relied on private land isolation. Remote ranches in the Sierra Madre acted as unintended nature preserves because they were too difficult to log or develop.

The Elk Gap

The single biggest ecological difference today is elk. Arizona replaced its lost native elk with a massive, successful herd of Rocky Mountain elk. Mexico never did. This means Arizona has a massive prey base for wolves and lions that Mexico lacks, creating a "food imbalance" at the border that complicates predator recovery in the south.

 

Wednesday, November 02, 2022

Arizona Monarchs Visit California and Mexico

 Five years ago my wife and I joined other local citizen scientists at Willow Lake for an enjoyable afternoon catching and tagging monarch butterflies.  The tags are small stickers with ID numbers.  They  don't impair the butterfly's ability to fly, but they do let us humans track where they fly to!


A monarch in the hand.

 The Southwest Monarch Study group recently updated their map showing the location of recovered tags.  The straight lines indicate starting and ending locations, not necessarily the meandering paths monarchs take to migrate across the landscape. 

Image from Southwest Monarch Study.  

  Over the ensuing years, those tagged butterflies have turned up as far away as the monarch's overwintering grounds in Mexico. Interestingly, they also visit California overwintering sites.  Most monarch populations can be neatly divided into Eastern and Western populations based on where they spend the winter; Eastern go to Mexico and Western go to California.  But it seems AZ monarchs can go to either, which raises the fascinating question: how do they decide where to go?  Is AZ a meeting spot for different populations, and each return to their home wintering sites, or is AZ a melting pot, a single population where individuals decide each year where to overwinter?

Hopefully this citizen science research will help resolve some of the question marks on monarch migration maps.

Monarch migration map from Xerces.


Monarch migration map from Monarch Watch. 




Saturday, February 28, 2009

Pinacate Biosphere Reserve


Nature is more than the sum of its parts -- it possesses a magic unifying principle, spark of life, existence beyond and apart and aloof from the simplifying, pattern-making mind of man.


This was a landscape alive: humming, buzzing, chirping, ...
What Mexico looked like before fast food, trash, and grazing: undisturbed, incredibly luscious and beautiful.


Lava flows jumbled like bulk food; angular irregular boulders of roungly similar size tumble down toward Big Rock Wash, where a curious all-green tree called Palo Verde grows alongside the Elephant Tree (green under crinkling off gold paper) and the Ironwood Tree --...an alive, verdanmt buzzing blooming profusion: "a vibratory place". WIthout illusion or pretense - yet still hard to see -- perhaps things are the wrong size, strange shapes in complicated, yet ordered landscapes. Only a few species of grass. WIldflowers everywhere - if you look. (I had to crunch a patch to lie down and write this).


At the (dry) stream banks (marked by whitened rocks) grow bush-nightshade and desert lavender, not holding back rock erosion, intermixed. At intervals crazy flowers bloom: hibiscus... High scree slope of creosote, burro bush , brittlebrush, jr. elephant trees, ocotillo. The rocks are dry, brittle: some pummice. B.O. Flower. Mallow. Stickleaf Mentzelia. Dahlia.



Soil (between jammed gravel jammed between boulders) is tan and almost entirely clay plus a few sub-sandgrain particles. THe parent rock is basalt w/ quartz crystals scattered in. Black rock remains hot to the touch after the shadow has replaced sun. Probably dehydrated, discombobulated, waiting in the shadows, feeling the ever-moving air breeze cool my skin. A vulture circled me, left, came back. When the wind leaves, the buzzing rises, busy coevolution.













------------------
Map of Tinajas (water holes) in the Sierra Pinacate, prepared by Julian Hayden, archeologist.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Fate of the Borderlands in the Global Economy

Just back from Mexico, an exotic frontier somewhere near these borderlands. All the maps are jumbled (and all the people ask, "what, really, is a border?") and (I don't know if you've heard of this) even the GPS systems are confused here, the systems based on NAD 1927 are off by a couple hundred meters from the revised 1983 version, the earth's bulge having migrated in that time, or the poles shifting, a gentle shrugging action that stretches the wasteline/equator and dragged mountains hiccuping across the corpulence. But things stick and the motion is not always fluid, so you get what we have here, impossibly arbitrary borders that people will die to (double?) cross. Constant movement without change.

I don't know how much it is in the Mass (catholic?) mediums, but southern Arizona is in a state of simmering chaos. Some accounts have the drug lords outpacing total Mexican federal spending. They reutinely kidnap Mexican police officers, and there have been firefights between the U.S. border patrol and defiant thugs. They retaliate with terrorism; recently, all of the police officers from a border village were killed (about 30), and the Mexican army was only able to regain apparent control at the expense of heavy casualties on both sides. Because law here is based here totally on force, with no shred of social contract, this can be a very lawless place, with only the sheen of daytime normality, the bright truth of the desert sun, to obscure the midnight drama. In places along the border there are so many abandonded backpacks that you cannot walk without stepping on them...every one of these backpacks is a new American. The border patrol is fighting a hit-and-run game of interdiction, but are, if anything, in retreat, having mainly fallen back behind the 32nd parallel.

Much of the action of Hemingway's "A farewell to arms" derives from his character's intimate knowledge of italian geography, as e.g. he floats down a river after mutineering. To know a landscape well enough to navigate totally 'blind' (without the aid of cars and roads, technology, internet information) is my goal here. Like the back of my own hand, like a lover. This is a years-long courtship, She is so Vast; not that a one-night stand would be insulting, but I always want more, to see the next curve around a canyon, the way her leaves change in different places, at different times. The native fish swimming in moist places, the howls and stars at night.

Globalization has always existed, but now it is so fast -- before anything can exist for itself it is pasted in front of a million backgrounds, nothing connected by anything but convenience, constantly swirling connections, getting nowhere. The nightmare of too-drunk total vertiginous movement while lying afraid to move on a bed of surround-sound. But according to economists, the speed of dollar turnaround, the mobility of capital, is what creates wealth. The faster we spend it the more we have, and nobody can devalue the American dollar if we keep consuming, which we couldn't do if they stopped buying imaginary dollars. They believe in the imaginary dollars because we look wealthy because we spend them so fast: constant movement without change.

Meanwhile, I've been learning the art and science of tracking at a Mexican ranch. Now the dirt speaks and I cannot help listening, and we following where it leads...Jaguars live here. What strange power these dark creatures hold over us, that even in the caccoonish confines of our surround-sound media center we are moved by their perfect power?! They also want to cross the border into america, the wonderful wilderness santuaries we have built of their historical (100, 150 years ago) habitat, but the Wall might be more of a problem for them than for "coyotes". When the bright-eyed beast circles in Your dreams, embrace it, it will make you stronger.

What we love we shall grow to resemble. -Bernard of Clairvaux.
-with apologies to Nona, who will Understand.

Monday, October 01, 2007

The Wildlands Project

"We are ambitious. We live for the day when grizzlies in Chihuaha have an unbroken connection to grizzlies in Alaska, when wolf populations are restored from Mexico to the Yukon to Maine; when vast forests and flowing prairies again thrive and support their full range of native plants and animals; when humans dwell on the land with respect, humility, and affection."

Contrasted with some environmental groups that fight to save "the last great places", the Wildlands Project (TWP) advance a positive vision: Rewilding.

Rewilding means "safeguard biodiversity where it is intact and restore the integrity of wild Nature where it has been compromised." For example, "as a first step toward protecting the extraordinary biological richness of Mexico's northern Sierra Madre Occidental mountains and the adjacent prairies, our Mexican staff identified ecologically significant areas, including critical habitat for jaguars, thick-billed parrots, and black-tailed praire dogs...We intend that Arizona and New Mexico will once again have jaguars in the arroyos and thick-billed parrots feeding on pine cones. But such intentions are only fantasies unless we first protect these animals' habitats in northwestern Mexico."

Note: Even with a positive vision, the best conservation plan needs be defensive in this time of explosive development of mineral resources and degraded agricultural land. Why do they capitalize "Nature"? Restore, rewild, revitalize, renew, rebalance, replenish, regenerate, reconnect.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Thank-you for Your Help

because of you I walked out one last time
into the Baja sun and bright concrete surround
I said goodbye to nobody and thanked no one for their help
silently without moving my lips
no vibration on take-off
blink and then the clouds opened over Dallas
the grid-plan
welcome to the American machine
consumed and then the west Texas farmfields,
Guadalupe mountains, White Sands Nat'l Monument,
the rocky backbone of the continental divide,
islands perched in the sky,
home: a rusted plane by the runway
two beautiful women with perfect posture
walking away from me into the setting Tucson sun

Saturday, December 02, 2006

A Good Trip

a good trip in mexico





teddy bear forest
slow rhythm of sunsets
movement of light and mind




sever the connection between
mind and body
central nervous system
city and wilderness
boundaries









the desert landscape
cars
anchor to the world






this is the way it always is.
vacation.
straight from the horse's mouth





you can't escape 'cause
its always there
open minds
light stomachs






hands were made for this
eating more than an avocado
Sisyphus carrying a stone






driving into the circle of light
Tucson
eye rimmed with lashes





remembered dreams after
dozens of contrails
living a part in a scientific experiment
electrodes in my flesh and brain






shrouded dark moon figure
walking with a cane
against the stars









sunset needs color
irreducible
the synesthesia is constant




the first time
sliding around a subset
of the edges in the room
mistake change for control
and complexity for freedom








welcome to the moon

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Rocky Point Water Temperature and the Failure of a Defintion of Rationality

What is rationality? As good a definition as any I've heard is: someone who doesn't give away money.

A preference set [A>B, B>C, and C>A] is not logical because you would pay money to trade C for A, B for C, and then A for B until you've spent all your money to end up no better than you began. Unfortunately, one of the first results of game theory is that exactly such a preference set can be expressed by groups of (at least three) voters, each of whom has an individually rational preference set. For example, in a recent election, voters preferred Gore to Bush, Bush to McCain, and McCain to Gore.

If the human mind is composed of parts that interact or "vote" to make decisions, with no Kantian Captain making a final logical check, individual actions would be just as irrational. And thanks to Nicole, I am now convinced that rationality is overrated -- it doesn't explain human actions. The reasons we give for our actions ARE important (we can't look just at actions for meaning) even if they're not logical. If our reasons are nonsensical, that itself is no reason (or at most, a reason on par with any other possibly countervailing "reason") to discount our words.

Furthermore, logic can be used to force certain responses, for example, giving 100 dollars away: True or false: you will either give me 100 dollars or you will answer false? If you say false, you are an irrational liar, no better than the man who trades A for B, then B for C, and (because he prefers C to A), C for A. But if you say true, you didn't say false, so you have to give me 100 dollars. To which Sanjay issued his infamous "f*ck you!!!!!!!!!!!!!".

How could it be rational to give away money?