Forest thinning can be controversial. Concerned citizens want to know when logging counts as restoration; can thinning a forest have beneficial ecological effects beyond reducing the risk of stand-replacing wildfires? Will cutting trees increase soil moisture because there are less "straws sucking up water", or does it decrease soil moisture due to increased windspeed and more sunlight drying out the forest understory?
 |
| April 2017 - views of Rogers Lake, AZ overlooking untreated (left) and treated (right) areas. Photos by Conor Flynn. Click this link to play with the slider. |
Whether thinned forests are drier or wetter is complicated. The excellent paper "Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions" by Prichard et al provides a good introduction to this question:
"Decreasing canopy bulk density can change site climatic conditions (Agee and Skinner 2005). Wildfire ignition potential is largely driven by fuel moisture, which can decrease on drier sites when canopy bulk density is reduced through commercial thinning (e.g., Reinhardt et al. 2006). Reduced canopy bulk density can lead to increased surface wind speed and fuel heating, which allows for increased rates of fire spread in thinned forests (Pimont et al. 2009, Parsons et al. 2018). Other studies show no effect of thinning on surface fuel moisture (Bigelow and North 2012, Estes et al. 2012), suggesting that thinning effects on surface winds and fuel moisture are complex, site specific, and likely vary across ecoregions and seasons."
Anecdotally, some people have noticed springs beginning to flow again after thinning and prescribed fire in AZ.
My research in NM pinyon noted increased soil moisture at thinned sites (unpublished data), however this could be due to the specifics of how thinning was accomplished at those sites. Thinned slash was chipped and the chips were left on-site without follow-up prescribed fire.
In addition to water quantity, water quality should also be considered. Prichard et al point out that "Treatments in watersheds that are distant from the WUI and protect municipal and agricultural water supplies are critical to minimizing high-severity fire impacts that can jeopardize clean water delivery (Bladon 2018, Hallema et al. 2018). For example, post-fire erosion and debris flows may cause more detrimental and longer-term impacts to watersheds than the wildfires themselves (Jones et al. 2018, Kolden and Henson 2019)." However, even carefully managed thinning and prescribed fire can generate excess erosion from new roads, decreased large woody debris, and increased mobility of light charred wood. Charcoal washing into local lakes can cause fish kills, even when not generated by catastrophic wildfire. Creating erosion-control structures as part of forest thinning work could help to mitigate these risks.
Further research is needed to ensure that large thinning projects adequately account for water cycle restoration in addition to natural stand density and fire interval restoration.
